000 | 01775nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20231121133131.0 | ||
008 | 231121b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aSon, Myungsoo _eauthor |
|
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aEarnings announcement timing and analyst following _cby Myungsoo Son and Aaron D. Crabtree |
264 |
_aThousand Okas, CA: _bSage Publications; _c2011. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aThe Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | _aUsing a large sample of firms in the post–Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) era, we examine the cross-sectional association between earnings announcement timing and analyst following that precedes it—that is, potential competing information. We fail to find a positive association between earnings announcement delay and preceding analyst following, as would be expected if the two were substitutes. Our findings of a negative association suggest that firms with large analyst following tend to announce annual earnings earlier than others. Furthermore, when we investigate the tendency of analysts to follow firms, a negative association exists in the regression of analyst following on prior earnings announcement delay, suggesting that analysts are more likely to follow firms that report earnings early. Collectively, managers’ earnings announcement timing and analyst following are not a substitutive relation, but rather a complementary one. | ||
650 | _aEarnings announcement delay | ||
650 | _aAnalyst following | ||
700 | 1 |
_aCrabtree, Aaron D. _eauthor |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11401223 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c163499 _d163499 |