000 | 02695nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20231121102603.0 | ||
008 | 231121b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aHossain, Mahmud _eauthor |
|
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aCorporate governance and earnings management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act regimes : _bevidence from implicated option backdating firms _cby Mahmud Hossain, Santanu Mitra, Zabihollah Rezae and Bharat Sarath |
264 |
_aThousand Oaks CA: _bSage Publ;ications; _c2011. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aThe Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting and Finance _vVolume 26, number 2, |
||
520 | _aBackdating stock options, a practice that retroactively adjusts stock option grant dates to lower the exercise price, has raised governance, legal, accounting, tax, and auditing concerns. The practice of backdating options generally is believed to be a result of both ineffective corporate governance and management opportunism. Both of these factors have been linked to a higher level of discretionary accruals adjustments. This study examines the accruals-based earnings management patterns for a group of firms that were implicated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for backdating stock options with a matched control group of nonimplicated firms for a time period surrounding the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses show that in the pre-SOX years, the sample of implicated firms managed abnormal accruals at a significantly greater level than the matched group of nonimplicated firms. The differential pattern of accruals management across these two groups becomes insignificant in the post-SOX period. Our result also suggests that the effect of SOX on mitigating the level of accruals management is substantially greater for the implicated companies than for the nonimplicated companies. The difference in the effect of SOX on the two groups of firms persists even after controlling for the differences in their governance and internal control effectiveness. We, therefore, suggest that SOX had effects on management’s reporting choices beyond those resulting from improvements in governance and internal control over financial reporting. | ||
650 | _aCorporate governance | ||
650 | _aSarbanes-Oxley Act | ||
650 | _aAccruals-Based Earnings Management | ||
700 | 1 |
_aMitra, Santanu _eauthor |
|
700 | 1 |
_aRezaee, Zabihollah _eauthor |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSarath, Bharat _eauthor |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X114012 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c163491 _d163491 |