000 02695nam a22002777a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20231121102603.0
008 231121b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aMSU
_cMSU
_erda
100 1 _aHossain, Mahmud
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aCorporate governance and earnings management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act regimes :
_bevidence from implicated option backdating firms
_cby Mahmud Hossain, Santanu Mitra, Zabihollah Rezae and Bharat Sarath
264 _aThousand Oaks CA:
_bSage Publ;ications;
_c2011.
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _aThe Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting and Finance
_vVolume 26, number 2,
520 _aBackdating stock options, a practice that retroactively adjusts stock option grant dates to lower the exercise price, has raised governance, legal, accounting, tax, and auditing concerns. The practice of backdating options generally is believed to be a result of both ineffective corporate governance and management opportunism. Both of these factors have been linked to a higher level of discretionary accruals adjustments. This study examines the accruals-based earnings management patterns for a group of firms that were implicated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for backdating stock options with a matched control group of nonimplicated firms for a time period surrounding the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses show that in the pre-SOX years, the sample of implicated firms managed abnormal accruals at a significantly greater level than the matched group of nonimplicated firms. The differential pattern of accruals management across these two groups becomes insignificant in the post-SOX period. Our result also suggests that the effect of SOX on mitigating the level of accruals management is substantially greater for the implicated companies than for the nonimplicated companies. The difference in the effect of SOX on the two groups of firms persists even after controlling for the differences in their governance and internal control effectiveness. We, therefore, suggest that SOX had effects on management’s reporting choices beyond those resulting from improvements in governance and internal control over financial reporting.
650 _aCorporate governance
650 _aSarbanes-Oxley Act
650 _aAccruals-Based Earnings Management
700 1 _aMitra, Santanu
_eauthor
700 1 _aRezaee, Zabihollah
_eauthor
700 1 _aSarath, Bharat
_eauthor
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X114012
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c163491
_d163491