000 02195nam a22002297a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20230926094922.0
008 230926b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aMSU
_cMSU
_erda
100 _aPALSSON, Gisli
245 _aBiosocial Relations of Production
264 _aCambridge
_bCambridge University Press
_c2009
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _aComparative Studies in Society and History
_vVolume , number ,
520 _aNowadays, life itself is one of the most active zones of capitalist production. Not only has biology been upgraded to Big Science, biological material and information are increasingly the subject of engineering, banking, reproduction, and exchange. The description and broad implications of the refiguring of life itself and its intrusion into economics and politics represent some of the most important issues on the academic agenda at the beginning of the twenty-first century (Pálsson 2007). Foucault's works on biopolitics (see, for instance, Foucault 1994) have obviously contributed critical insights with respect to the current refashioning of the human body, illuminating the political and governmental dimensions of these developments (Inda 2005; Rose 2006; Gottweis and Peterson 2008; Nowotny and Testa 2009; Lock and Nguyen 2009). Recently, a series of scholars have revisited the early writings of Marx, sometimes in combination with Foucauldian perspectives, in their attempt to make sense of the political economy of modern biotechnology, including the fragmenting of body parts and the labor process involved. One of the emerging themes in current discussions relates to the conception and role of labor in the reproduction of bodies and body parts. While Marx may not be an obvious source of innovative perspectives on the modern production of human biovalue, a somewhat unique industry that had not arrived in his time, his early works offer useful insights into contemporary developments.
650 _abiosocial relations
650 _aproduction
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417509000139
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c163356
_d163356