000 | 01352nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20230914102554.0 | ||
008 | 230914b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | _aCURZI, D | ||
245 | _aTrade collapse, quality and food exports | ||
264 |
_aNew York _bTaylorn & Francis _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aApplied Economics Letters _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | _aThis article revisits the so-called ‘Collapse in Quality’ hypothesis, according to which, during the 2008–2009 crisis, higher quality goods experienced a stronger export reduction compared to low-quality ones. Using disaggregated trade data from three European countries that traditionally export high-quality food products – France, Italy and Spain – we do not find any econometric evidence supporting this hypothesis. In contrast, we provide preliminary evidence for the concurrent hypothesis, namely that firms reduced their markup to preserve market share. | ||
650 | _a2008 - 2009 crisis | ||
650 | _atrade collapse | ||
650 | _afood quality | ||
700 | _aPACCA, L | ||
700 | _aOLPER, A | ||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.829191 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c163253 _d163253 |