000			01392nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20240429131338.0
008			230622b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a13504851
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda _bEnglish
050	0	0	_aHB1.A666 APP
100	1		_aDijkgraaf, E. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aCost advantage cooperations larger than private waste collectors/ _ccreated by Elbert Dijkgraaf and Raymond Gradus
264	1		_aNew York: _bTaylor and Francis, _c2013.
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aApplied economics letters _vVolume 20, number 7
520	3		_aFor refuse collection, we estimate the cost effects of different institutional modes using panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities between 1998 and 2010. The modes we consider are private enterprises, intermunicipal cooperation, municipality-owned enterprises and in-house collection. For private companies, the cost advantage becomes substantially smaller and nonsignificant if municipal fixed effects are included. The cost advantage of intermunicipal cooperation is larger in this case than that of privatization.
650			_aWaste collection _vPrivate firms _xContracting out
700	1		_aGradus, R. H. J. M. _eco author
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.732682
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c162671 _d162671