000 | 01590nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20230614151714.0 | ||
008 | 230614b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | _aTURNQUIST, Mark | ||
245 | _aDesign for resilience in infrastructure distribution networks | ||
264 |
_aNew York _bSpringer _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_a Environment Systems & Decisions _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | _aThe recognition that resilience is a critical aspect of infrastructure security has caused the national and homeland security communities to ask “How does one ensure infrastructure resilience?” Previous network resilience analysis methods have generally focused on either pre-disruption prevention investments or post-disruption recovery strategies. This paper expands on those methods by introducing a stochastic optimization model for designing network infrastructure resilience that simultaneously considers pre- and post-disruption activities. The model seeks investment–recovery combinations that minimize the overall cost to a distribution network across a set of disruption scenarios. A set of numerical experiments illustrates how changes to disruption scenarios probabilities affect the optimal resilient design investments. | ||
650 | _aresilience | ||
650 | _anetwork optimisation | ||
650 | _ainfrastructures | ||
700 | _aVUGRIN, Eric | ||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-012-9428-z | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c162602 _d162602 |