000 | 01720nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20230606151845.0 | ||
008 | 230606b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | _aCLEVENGER, Anthony P | ||
245 |
_aPotential impacts of highway median barriers on wildlife _bstate of the practice and gap analysis |
||
264 |
_aNew York _bSpringer _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_a Environmental Management _vVolume , number , |
||
520 | _aMedian barriers separate lanes of traffic moving in opposite directions on multilane highways. Such traffic safety devices can reduce head-on collisions but also have the potential to reduce landscape permeability by impeding wildlife movements across highways. Median barriers may also increase the risk of wildlife–vehicle collisions if an animal becomes trapped or confused amid barriers searching for a place to cross. A 2002 Transportation Research Board report highlighted the need to better understand the potential impacts of highway median barriers on wildlife. This lack of information can cause significant project delays and increase transportation project costs. This study represents the first attempt in North America to bring together information about highway median and roadside barriers and wildlife and provide preliminary guidelines to balance the needs of motorist safety and wildlife movements. | ||
650 | _abarrier effect | ||
650 | _ahabitat fragmentation | ||
650 | _ahighway median barrier | ||
700 | _aKOCIOLEK, Angela V | ||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0155-0 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c162531 _d162531 |