000			02070nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20230529154353.0
008			230529b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aMEASHAM, Thomas
245			_aSuccess factors for community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) _blessons from Kenya and Australia
264			_aNew York _bSpringer _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_a Environmental Management _vVolume , number ,
520			_aRecent concerns over a crisis of identity and legitimacy in community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) have emerged following several decades of documented failure. A substantial literature has developed on the reasons for failure in CBNRM. In this paper, we complement this literature by considering these factors in relation to two successful CBNRM case studies. These cases have distinct differences, one focusing on the conservation of hirola in Kenya on community-held trust land and the other focusing on remnant vegetation conservation from grazing pressure on privately held farm land in Australia. What these cases have in common is that both CBNRM projects were initiated by local communities with strong attachments to their local environments. The projects both represent genuine community initiatives, closely aligned to the original aims of CBNRM. The intrinsically high level of “ownership” held by local residents has proven effective in surviving many challenges which have affected other CBNRM projects: from impacts on local livelihoods to complex governance arrangements involving non-government organizations and research organizations. The cases provide some signs of hope among broader signs of crisis in CBNRM practice.
650			_acommunity based conservation
650			_acapacity building
650			_acommunity participation
700			_aLUMBASI, Jared A
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0114-9
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c162427 _d162427