000			01816nam a22002417a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20230516170800.0
008			230516b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aGENELETTI, D
245			_aResearch in strategic environmental assessment neeeds to better address analytical methods
264			_aLondon _bImperial College Press _c2015
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aJournal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management _vVolume , number ,
520			_aOne of the main gaps in current SEA research is the limited development of analytical methods to predict and assess environmental effects, which are tailored to plans, programmes and policies. The scientific literature is producing new standards and evidence-based conclusions on a number of issues that are potentially relevant for SEA, including health, land take, ecosystem fragmentation and energy needs and supply. However, research in SEA is hardly keeping the pace in terms of "translating" these findings into operational recommendations that can be applied in typical SEA contexts. As a result, the analytical content of SEA is often disappointingly low, and the assessment of impacts is still largely based on qualitative descriptions and general statements. Future research should be directed at innovating SEA methods, by promoting the use of appropriate spatially-explicit and (semi)quantitative approaches, which can be based on advances in relevant disciplines, and the increasing availability of data and technology.
650			_aspatial planning
650			_ahealth
650			_aecosystem fragmentation
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333215500143
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c162177 _d162177