000			01930nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20221212125033.0
008			221209b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aCampbell, Jamie I. D. _eauthor
245			_aRetrieval-induced forgetting of arithmetic facts but not rules _ccreated by Jamie I. D. Campbell, Nicole H. Therriault
264			_aCanada : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume , number ,
520			_aRetrieval of a multiplication fact (2×6 =12) can disrupt retrieval of its addition counterpart (2+6=8). We investigated whether this retrieval-induced forgetting effect applies to rule-governed arithmetic facts (i.e., 0×N=0, 1×N=N). Participants (n=40) practised rule-governed multiplication problems (e.g., 1×4, 0×5) and multiplication facts (e.g., 2×3, 4×5) for four blocks and then were tested on the addition counterparts (e.g., 1+4, 0+5, 2+3, 4+5) and control additions. Increased addition response times and errors relative to controls occurred only for problems corresponding to multiplication facts, with no problem-specific effects on addition counterparts of rule-governed multiplications. In contrast, the rule-governed 0+N problems provided evidence of generalisation of practice across items, whereas the fact-based 1+N problems did not. These findings support the theory that elementary arithmetic rules and facts involve distinct memory processes, and confirmed that previous, seemly inconsistent findings of RIF in arithmetic owed to the inclusion or exclusion of rule-governed problems.
650			_aArithmetic rules
650			_aCognitive arithmetic
650			_aRetrieval-induced forgetting
700			_aTherriault, Nicole H. _eauthor
856			_u10.1080/20445911.2013.798328
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c160740 _d160740