000 04671nam a22002417a 4500
003 ZW-GwMSU
005 20221207160413.0
008 221207b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aMSU
_cMSU
_erda
100 _aSarkar, Shraban
_eathour
245 _a Altmetric Original Articles Soil depth estimation through soil-landscape modelling using regression kriging in a Himalayan terrain
_ccreated Shraban Sarkar , Archana K. Roy & Tapas R. Martha
264 _aIndia:
_bTaylor and Fancis,
_c2013.
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
_bnc
440 _vVolume , number ,
520 _aSoil formation depends upon several factors such as parent material, soil biota, topography and climate. It is difficult to use conventional soil survey methods for mapping the depth of soil in complex mountainous terrains. In this context, the present study aimed to estimate the soil depth for a large area (330.35 km2) using different geo-environmental factors through a soil-landscape regression kriging (RK) model in the Darjeeling Himalayas. RK with seven predictor variables such as elevation, slope, aspect, general curvature, topographic wetness index, distance from the streams and land use, was used to estimate the soil depth. While topographic parameters were derived from an 8-m resolution digital elevation model, the ortho-rectified Cartosat-1 satellite image was used to prepare the land use map. Soil depth measured at 148 sites within the study area was used to calibrate and validate the RK model. The result showed that the RK model with the seven predictors could explain 67% spatial variability of soil depth with a prediction variance between 0.23 and 0.42 m at the test site. In the regression analysis, land use (0.133) and slope (–0.016) were identified as significant determinants of soil depth. The prediction map showed higher soil depth in south-facing slopes and near valleys in comparison to other areas. Mean, mean absolute and root mean-square errors were used to access the reliability of the prediction, which indicated a goodness-of-fit of the RK model. Keywords: Darjeeling Himalayasdigital elevation modelregression krigingsoil depth Previous article View issue table of contents Next article Acknowledgements The first author is thankful to University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India for providing the fellowship to carry out the research work. He is also thankful to Dr. Edwin and his family for their support during field work. More Share Options   Related research People also read Recommended articles Cited by 20 Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes P. E. GESSLER et al. International journal of geographical information systems Published online: 5 Feb 2007 Soil formation depends upon several factors such as parent material, soil biota, topography and climate. It is difficult to use conventional soil survey methods for mapping the depth of soil in complex mountainous terrains. In this context, the present study aimed to estimate the soil depth for a large area (330.35 km2) using different geo-environmental factors through a soil-landscape regression kriging (RK) model in the Darjeeling Himalayas. RK with seven predictor variables such as elevation, slope, aspect, general curvature, topographic wetness index, distance from the streams and land use, was used to estimate the soil depth. While topographic parameters were derived from an 8-m resolution digital elevation model, the ortho-rectified Cartosat-1 satellite image was used to prepare the land use map. Soil depth measured at 148 sites within the study area was used to calibrate and validate the RK model. The result showed that the RK model with the seven predictors could explain 67% spatial variability of soil depth with a prediction variance between 0.23 and 0.42 m at the test site. In the regression analysis, land use (0.133) and slope (–0.016) were identified as significant determinants of soil depth. The prediction map showed higher soil depth in south-facing slopes and near valleys in comparison to other areas. Mean, mean absolute and root mean-square errors were used to access the reliability of the prediction, which indicated a goodness-of-fit of the RK model. 
650 _a Darjeeling Himalayas
_v
650 _adigital evaluationmodel
650 _agression kriging
856 _u DOI:10.1080/13658816.2013.814780Corpus ID: 493068
942 _2lcc
_cJA
999 _c160728
_d160728