000 | 01871nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20221130125515.0 | ||
008 | 221130b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aDamme, Ilse Van _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aThe effect of mood on confidence in false memories _ccreated by Ilse Van Damme, Lien Seynaeve |
||
264 |
_aBelgium : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aThe goal of this study was to examine the effect of mood on suggestibility in the misinformation paradigm. To investigate the relative effects of valence and arousal, as well as affect-specific influences, six mood conditions were included: positive mood with low/high arousal (serene/happy), negative mood with low/high arousal (sad/angry), neutral mood, and a control condition. Participants watched a movie and were exposed to misleading information by means of a narrative. Memory was tested in a surprise forced-choice recognition task, with confidence judgements. The mood induction procedure was shown to be effective. A significant misinformation effect confirmed that participants were misled by the false information provided. Mood did not affect susceptibility to the misinformation effect, but did significantly influence participants’ belief in their false memories. Feeling sad induced the highest confidence ratings. Results are discussed in terms of different problem-solving strategies associated with discrete affective states, and have implications for both legal and clinical settings. | ||
650 | _aArousal | ||
650 | _aConfidence | ||
650 | _aFalse memory | ||
700 |
_aSeynaeve, Lien _eauthor |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.769440 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c160678 _d160678 |