000			02009nam a22002777a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20221130124140.0
008			221130b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aDabic, Stephanie _eauthor
245			_aUser perceptions and evaluations of short vibrotactile feedback _ccraeted by Stephanie Dabic, Jordan Navarro, Jean-Marc Tissot, Remy Versace
264			_aFrance : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume , number ,
520			_aThe objective of the present study was to provide a better understanding of the factors that influence discrimination and subjective assessment of vibrotactile feedbacks during active interaction with a touchscreen. Twenty-four participants were presented with 162 pairs of vibrotactile signals that varied in frequency (60 Hz, 130 Hz, 200 Hz), waveform (sine, square and triangle), and duration (around 123 ms for short and 163 ms for long). Participants had to complete three successive tasks: a dissimilarity task, a preference judgement task, and a resemblance (to push-buttons) judgement task. For the discrimination task, a MultiDimensional Scale analysis revealed: (1) a predominant role of frequency, (2) a role of duration for a given frequency, and (3) no role of waveform. An analysis of variance performed on the preference and resemblance data also point out the main role of the signal frequency. Finally, a correlation was found between preference and resemblance data, indicating that the participants tend to prefer signals judged to be similar to familiar tactile sensations.
650			_a Active interaction
650			_aHaptic
650			_aShort vibrotactile signals
700			_aNavarro, Jordan _eauthor
700			_aTissot, Jean-Marc _eauthor
700			_aVersace, Remy _eauthor
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.768997
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c160677 _d160677