000 | 01803nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20221129160118.0 | ||
008 | 221129b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aWeingartner, Kristin M. _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aEffects of changes in narrative time on eye movements and recognition responses _ccreated by Kristin M. Weingartner, Jerome L. Myers |
||
264 |
_aUSA : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aIn two experiments we examined how temporal aspects of narrative events influence comprehension. In Experiment 1 participants read paragraphs in which a critical event was followed by a phrase that signalled a time shift (After an hour vs. After a moment). Consistent with earlier findings (e.g., Zwaan, 1996), fixation durations were longer on the phrase that signalled a larger time shift. However, there was no evidence that a larger time shift affected the accessibility of event information in Experiment 1, when the dependent measure was ease of anaphor comprehension, or in Experiment 2, when a recognition probe task was used. Although the discontinuation of an event (Maurice stopped vs. was painting) did not affect anaphor reading times, it did lead to longer recognition times for the event. These results indicate that at least some event aspects remain accessible following a change in time and that the dependent measure can have a critical impact on the conclusions. | ||
650 | _aAnaphor comprehension | ||
650 | _aEye movements | ||
650 | _aReading | ||
700 |
_aMyers, Jerome L. _eauthor |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.768232 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c160671 _d160671 |