000			01905nam a22002657a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20221129132806.0
008			221129b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aRummer, Ralf _eauthor
245			_aTwo modality effects in verbal short-term memory: Evidence from sentence recall _ccreated by Ralf Rummer, Judith Schweppe & Randi C. Martin
264			_aGermany : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume , number ,
520			_aThis paper investigates the mechanisms underlying the standard modality effect (i.e., better recall performance for auditorily presented than for visually presented materials), and the modality congruency effect (i.e., better memory performance if the mode of recall and presentation are congruent rather than incongruent). We tested the assumption that the standard modality effect is restricted to the most recent word(s) of the sentences but occurs in both verbatim and gist recall (Experiments 1 and 2), whereas the modality congruency effect should be evident for the rest of the sentence when using verbatim recall (Experiment 3) but not when using gist recall (Experiment 4). All experiments used the Potter-Lombardi intrusion paradigm. When the target word was the most recent word of the sentence, a standard modality effect was found with both verbatim recall and gist recall. When the target word was included in the middle of the sentences, a modality congruency effect was found with verbatim recall but not with gist recall.
650			_aGist recall
650			_aModality congruency
650			_aModality effect
700			_aSchweppe, Judith _eauthor
700			_aMartin, Randi C. _eauthor
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.769953
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c160665 _d160665