000			01725nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20221128154540.0
008			221128b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aBobb, Susan C. _eauthor
245			_aLanguage switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning _ccreated by Susan C. Bobb, Zofia Wodniecka
264			_aPoland : _bTaylor & Francis; _c2013
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume , number ,
520			_aMeuter and Allport (1999) were among the first to implicate an inhibitory mechanism in bilingual language control. In their study, bilinguals took longer to name a number in the L1 directly following an L2 naming trial than to name a number in the L2 following an L1 naming trial, suggesting that bilinguals suppress the more dominant L1 during L2 production. Since then, asymmetric switch costs have not been replicated in all subsequent studies, and some have questioned whether switch costs necessarily reveal language inhibition. Based on methodological grounds and interpretability problems, we conclude that switch costs may not be the most reliable index of inhibition in bilingual language control. We review alternative proposals for the source of switch costs, and point to other indices of inhibition within the switching paradigm and from adapted paradigms.
650			_aLanguage switching
650			_aBilingualism
650			_aInhibition
700			_aWodniecka, Zofia _eauthor
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.792822
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c160647 _d160647