000 | 01755nam a22002297a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20221125154753.0 | ||
008 | 221125b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aWei , Ran _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aAn integrated approach for addressing geographic uncertainty in spatial optimization _ccreated by Ran Wei &Alan T. Murray |
||
264 |
_bTaylor and Francis _c2012 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aThere exist many facets of error and uncertainty in digital spatial information. As error or uncertainty will not likely ever be completely eliminated, a better understanding of its impacts is necessary. Spatial analytical approaches, in particular, must somehow address data-quality issues. This can range from evaluating impacts of potential data uncertainty in planning processes that make use of methods to devising methods that explicitly account for error/uncertainty. To date, little has been done to structure methods accounting for error. This article develops an integrated approach to address data uncertainty in spatial optimization. We demonstrate that it is possible to characterize uncertainty impacts by constructing and solving a new multi-objective model that explicitly incorporates facets of data uncertainty. Empirical findings indicate that the proposed approaches can be applied to evaluate the impacts of data uncertainty with statistical confidence, which moves beyond popular practices of simulating errors in data. | ||
650 | _aspatial uncertainty | ||
650 | _aspatial optimization | ||
650 | _aanti-covering location | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c160610 _d160610 |