000 | 01388nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20221114145705.0 | ||
008 | 221114b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aKret, Lisa _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aHope in Environmental Philosophy _ccreated by Lisa Kret |
||
264 |
_aAllendale _bSpringer _c2012 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aEcological philosophy requires a significant orientation to the role of hope in both theory and practice. I trace the limited presence of hope in ecological philosophy, and outline reasons why environmental hopelessness is a threat. I articulate and problematize recent environmental publications on the topic of hope, the most important worry being that current literature fails to provide the necessary psychological grounding for hopeful action. I turn to the psychology of hope to provide direction for conceptualizing hope and actualizing hoped for states of affairs. If positive moral action is the goal, hope is a vital concept for underwriting ecological philosophy and a practice requiring considerably more attention. | ||
650 | _ahope | ||
650 | _adespair | ||
650 | _aecological catastrophe | ||
856 | _uDOI 10.1007/s10806=012-9425-8 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c160442 _d160442 |