000 | 01716nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20221108122405.0 | ||
008 | 221108b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aCornell, Dewey _eauthor |
||
245 |
_aPeer victimization and authoritative school climate: A multilevel approach. _ccreated by D., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. |
||
264 |
_aVirginia _bAmerican Psychological Association _c2015 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aSchool climate is widely recognized as an important influence on peer victimization in schools. The purpose of this study is to examine how authoritative school climate theory provides a framework for conceptualizing 2 key features of school climate—disciplinary structure and student support—that are associated with 3 measures of peer victimization. Multilevel multivariate modeling in a statewide sample of 39,364 7th- and 8th-grade students attending 423 schools revealed meaningful associations at both the student and school levels of analysis. Higher disciplinary structure was associated with lower levels of prevalence of teasing and bullying, bullying victimization, and general victimization. Higher student support was associated with lower prevalence of teasing and bullying and general victimization. Overall, these findings add new evidence to the theory that an authoritative school climate is conducive to lower peer victimization. | ||
650 | _abullying | ||
650 | _aschool climate | ||
650 | _apeer victimization | ||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000038 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c160173 _d160173 |