000			01537nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20221025123753.0
008			221025b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100			_aCARTER, Min Z.
245			_aAre we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust.
264			_aWashington _bAmerican Psychological Association _c2015
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_vVolume , number ,
520			_aTaking a multiple-stakeholder perspective, we examined the effects of supervisor–work group trust congruence on groups’ task and contextual performance using a polynomial regression and response surface analytical framework. We expected motivation experienced by work groups to mediate the positive influence of trust congruence on performance. Although hypothesized congruence effects on performance were more strongly supported for affective rather than for cognitive trust, we found significant indirect effects on performance (via work group motivation) for both types of trust. We discuss the performance effects of trust congruence and incongruence between supervisors and work groups, as well as implications for practice and future research.
650			_asupervisor trust
650			_agroup trust
650			_awork group motivation
700			_aMOSSHOLDER, Kevin W.
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038798
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c159903 _d159903