000 | 01822nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210524145559.0 | ||
008 | 210524b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aDibb, Sally. _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aJudging the quality of customer segments: _bsegmentation effectiveness _ccreated by Sally Dibb and Lyndon Simkin |
264 |
_aAbingdon _bTaylor and Francis _c2010 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of Strategic Marketing _vVolume 18, number 2, |
||
520 | _aMarket segmentation is well established in marketing theory and applied by organisations from all industry sectors. Despite widespread use, developing and implementing segmentation schemes is rarely problem free. Testing the quality and robustness of segments is one of the difficulties which marketers face. The literature describes segment quality criteria which are intended to help with this task, yet there is little evidence of their deployment and efficacy in practice. Using a longitudinal case study from the Eastern European mobile phone market, the practical application, impact and efficacy of these segment quality criteria are examined. The findings reveal the value of combining ‘hard’ statistical and ‘soft’ segment quality criteria to test the validity and robustness of segmentation outputs prior to implementing the segmentation. Implications from this case for managers seeking to select and deploy suitable quality criteria are considered. | ||
650 | 4 | _aSegment quality criteria | |
650 | 4 | _aMarket segmentation | |
650 | 4 | _aSegmentation implementation | |
700 | 1 |
_aSimkin, Lyndon . _eauthor |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09652540903537048 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c157391 _d157391 |