000			01873nam a22002537a 4500
003			ZW-GwMSU
005			20210519151131.0
008			210519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aMSU _cMSU _erda
100	1		_aWait, Marius. _eauthor
245	1	0	_aSWOT Criteria for the strategic evaluation of work integrated learning projects _ccreated by Marius and Cookie Govender.
264			_aPretoria _bUNISA Press and Routledge _c2019
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
440			_aAfrica Education Review _vVolume 16, number 4,
520			_aWork integrated learning (WIL) is an integral part of the curriculum in higher education institutions (HEIs). WIL project leaders require a strategy to evaluate the success of WIL projects. This article reports on the evaluation criteria used in assessing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) identified in WIL projects. This multi-qualitative research was conducted to determine and confirm the SWOT criteria deemed significant for WIL project evaluation. Feedback was collated from 12 WIL specialists, representing the major HEIs in South Africa. The Delphi technique and inductive content analysis formed the basis of the research method. The key finding revealed that the strengths of WIL projects should be evaluated by measuring how well the WIL project maintains a competitive advantage and has a strong financial budget. Major weaknesses of WIL projects are a lack of strategic direction and the HEI’s lack of sound academic offerings and reputation.
650	4		_aWork integrated learning
650	4		_aWork integrated learning project
650	4		_aWork integrated learning evaluation
700			_aGovender, Cookie. _eauthor
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.1457965
942			_2lcc _cJA
999			_c157290 _d157290