000 | 01797nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210504092716.0 | ||
008 | 210504b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aWokadala.J _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBenefit Incidence Analysis of Government Spending on Public-Private Partnership Schooling under Universal Secondary Education Policy in Uganda/ _cCreated by Wokadala.J |
264 |
_aPretoria; _bUnisa Press and Routledge, _c2015. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aAfrica education review _vVolume 12 , number 3 , |
||
520 | _aThe study establishes whether government spending on private universal secondary education (USE) schools is equitable across quintiles disaggregated by gender and by region in Uganda. The study employs benefit incidence analysis tool on the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS 2009/10) data to establish the welfare impact of public subsidy on different households. The results reveal that the richer households benefit more from the subsidy than the poor. Similar patterns are evident across gender and regions. However, the subsidy as a share of total household spending is higher (49%) for poor households than the richer (6%). The contrast in the findings could be because the richer seem to have more school going children and thus spend more on each student. The concentration curves reveal that there are minimal achievements by the state funding to redistribute incomes to the poor. | ||
650 | 4 | _aBenefit incidence | |
650 | 4 | _aPublic-private partnership(PPP) | |
650 | 4 | _aUniversal secondary education(USE) | |
700 | 1 |
_aBarungi.M _eauthor |
|
856 | _uDOI:10.1080/18146627.2015.1110900 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156929 _d156929 |