000 | 02009nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210426152150.0 | ||
008 | 210426b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a0004-9441 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 |
_aHailaya, Wilham _eauthor |
||
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aExamining the utility of assessment literacy inventory and its portability to education systems in the Asia Pacific region/ _cWilham, Hailaya |
264 |
_aLos Angeles: _bSage, _c2014. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aAustralian journal education _vVolume 58 , number 3 , |
||
520 | _aTeachers use assessment to ascertain and enhance student learning, thus the importance of assessment literacy. One of the instruments that has been used to examine teachers’ assessment literacy is the Assessment Literacy Inventory developed by Mertler and Campbell. The Assessment Literacy Inventory has been validated using pre-service teachers and employing traditional statistical techniques. This study reports on the evaluation of the Assessment Literacy Inventory utility using 582 in-service teachers through employing the Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicate that the Assessment Literacy Inventory works well at the item level. However, the Assessment Literacy Inventory seven-factor structure, based on the Standards for Teacher Competence in Educational Assessment of Students, poses challenges against newer psychometric techniques. Hence, recommendations are presented. This article concludes with relevant implications for instrument development, educational assessment research, policy and practice, and teachers’ professional development. | ||
650 | 4 | _aAssessment | |
650 | 4 | _a Literacy | |
650 | 4 | _aConfirmatory factor analysis | |
700 | 1 |
_aBen Francisco _eauthor |
|
700 |
_aAlagumalai, Sivakumar _eauthor |
||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0004944114542984 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156730 _d156730 |