000 | 01841nam a22002537a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210423100710.0 | ||
008 | 210423b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a18146627 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aBotlhale, Emmanuel _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFinancing tertiary education under fiscal stress in Botswana / _ccreated by Emmanuel Botlhale |
264 |
_aPretoria _bUNISA and Routledge _c2015 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aAfrica Education Review _vVolume 12 , number 4 , |
||
520 | _aDeveloping countries place a high premium on education because it is believed to correlate with economic development. Similarly, Botswana adopted an education-for-development policy when it became independent in 1966. Providentially, it discovered and mined minerals, particularly diamonds, and funded education. Unfortunately, Botswana is a diamonds-led economy and suffered revenue losses due to the global economic crisis. Cutback budgeting became imperative and one of the questions that arose was; who should pay for tertiary education? While the government continues to fund it, calls for alternative financing models have arisen. While the call is legitimate in a resource-limited environment, this article argues that there is a need to interrogate the present financing model to improve it before embarking on new initiatives. Finally, while this case study is Botswana-specific, lessons can be drawn for resource- strained African countries. That is, it is vital to interrogate existing models before thinking of new ones. | ||
650 | _aEducation | ||
650 |
_aFinancing _xGlobal economic crisis |
||
650 | _aFiscal stress | ||
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2015.1112155 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156678 _d156678 |