000 | 02017nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210422150532.0 | ||
008 | 210422b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1814-6627 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aClowes, L _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aIts not a simple thing, co-publishing: _bThe politics of co-authorship between supervisors and students in South African higher educational contexts/ _cL. Clowes |
264 |
_aPretoria: _bUnisa Pres and Routledge, _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aAfrica education review _vVolume 10 , number 1, |
||
520 | _aKnowledge production in South Africa remains framed by the legacies of apartheid. Developing emerging authors and local knowledges through co-authorship between supervisors and post graduate students is an important strategy aimed at challenging these legacies. This paper draws on in-depth interviews with students and supervisors to explore their experiences of co-authorship. Findings indicate that while insisting that co-authoring has value, several students also note their discomfort with elements of the process. While insisting students’ work be disseminated, and expressing willingness to engage in the mentoring that this requires, supervisors also articulate discomfort with processes offering opportunities for personal career development. Given increasing emphasis on co-authorship we suggest the power inequalities expressed through the supervisor/student relationship be made more transparent. Knowledge production through co-authorship is best served by collaborations between authors who are more equally empowered and who are more critically aware of the challenges such collaborations are likely to present. | ||
650 | 4 | _aCo-authorship | |
650 | 4 | _aMentoring | |
650 | 4 | _aSupervision | |
700 | 1 |
_aShefer, T. _eauthor |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.786865 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156671 _d156671 |