000 | 01623nam a22002777a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20210412155349.0 | ||
008 | 210412b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a2169-7221 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
100 | 1 |
_aLuo Hong _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe monitoring role of media on executive compensation/ _cHong Luo |
264 |
_aTaylor and Francis: _bOxon, _c2013. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 | _vVolume , number , | ||
520 | _aThis paper investigates the monitoring role of media on executive compensation. Using data on media coverage from 2007 to 2009, we find that the media can serve as an effective external monitoring mechanism on executive compensation by affecting executive reputation. Specifically, negative media coverage and government intervention on media can enhance the monitoring role of media. We also find that the monitoring role of media and the market reaction to media coverage are stronger for non-state-owned corporations. Although the monitoring role of media is not different between monopolistic and non-monopolistic industries, the market reaction to media coverage is stronger for companies in non-monopolistic industries. We also find that there is less coverage on monopolistic and state-owned companies. | ||
650 | _aReputation mechanism | ||
650 | _aMedia coverage | ||
650 | _aExecutive compensation | ||
700 | 1 |
_aLiu Baohua _eauthor |
|
700 | 1 |
_aZhang Weiqian _eauthor |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/21697221.2013.802974 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156507 _d156507 |