000 | 01582nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20201217120020.0 | ||
008 | 201217b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a17487870 | ||
040 |
_aMSU _cMSU _erda |
||
050 | _aHD1918 | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCortuk, Orcan _eauthor |
|
245 | 1 | 2 |
_aA disaggregated approach to the determination of government spending multipliers _ccreated by Orcan Cortuk |
264 |
_aOxfordshire _bTaylor and Francis _c2013 |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc |
||
440 |
_aJournal of Economic Policy Reform _vVolume 16, number 1, |
||
520 | _aThis paper contributes to the debate on the effects of fiscal stimuli by showing that the impact of government expenditure depends on its composition. Government spending is not homogeneous and its effects on economic variables vary depending on its type. Comparing the effects of three types of government spending (investment, wage and non-wage components of consumption), it is concluded that government investment shocks are not the most effective spending shocks in boosting output, contrary to common opinion. Instead, the wage component government consumption has the biggest impact, whereas the non-wage component government consumption has the least. This variation stems mainly from the effects on (private) consumption. | ||
650 | _aGovernment investment | ||
650 | _aGovernment consumption | ||
650 | _aMultiplier | ||
856 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2012.755812 | ||
942 |
_2lcc _cJA |
||
999 |
_c156032 _d156032 |