000 | 01708nam a22003497a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | ZW-GwMSU | ||
005 | 20240311125109.0 | ||
008 | 240311b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9781472410672 (hbk.) | ||
020 | _a147241067X (hbk.) | ||
040 |
_bEnglish _cMSULIB _erda |
||
050 | 0 | 0 | _aKNQ4679.H85 EXC |
100 | 1 |
_aHsieh, Kuo-hsing _eAuthor _eNational Chung Cheng University, Taiwan |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe exclusionary rule of evidence : _bcomparative analysis and proposals for reform / _ccreated by Kuo-Hsing Hsieh |
264 | 1 |
_aFarnham _aBurlington _bAshgate _c2014 |
|
300 |
_ax, 250 pages ; _c24 cm |
||
336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 0 | _aInternational and comparative criminal justice | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Evolution and rationales -- The exclusionary rule debates -- Theoretical constitutional foundation -- Confessions obtained by police torture -- The operation of the exclusionary rule -- Shaping the exclusionary rule in practice -- Conclusion. | |
520 | _aThis book argues the need for the establishment of an exclusionary rule of evidence in China as a means of protecting the people from police wrongdoing. In support of the argument and as a means of developing a suitable process. | ||
650 | 0 |
_aExclusionary rule (Evidence) _zChina |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAdmissible evidence _zChina |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPolice questioning _zChina |
|
650 | 0 |
_aTorture _zChina _xPrevention |
|
650 | 0 |
_aLaw reform _zChina |
|
650 | 0 |
_aExclusionary rule (Evidence) _zGreat Britain |
|
650 | 0 |
_aExclusionary rule (Evidence) _zUnited States |
|
942 |
_2lcc _cB |
||
999 |
_c154339 _d154339 |