Spatial inequality, globalization, and footloose capital created by Toshiaki Takahashi, Hajime Takatsuka & Dao-Zhi Zeng
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0938-2259
- HB119 ECO
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | vol. 53, no. 1 (pages 213-238) | SP21288 | Not for loan | For in house use | |||
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 53, no.1 (pages 213-238) | SP21035 | Not for loan | For in house use |
This paper shows the equivalence of spatial inequalities in industrial location and in income by revisiting the home market effect (HME) without any homogeneous good based on a reconstructed footloose capital model. In this simple framework, spatial inequalities in industrial location and in income are the HMEs in terms of firm share and wage, respectively. We show that the larger country has a more-than-proportionate share of firms and a higher wage. Furthermore, both the wage differential and the industrial location in the larger country evolve in an inverted U-pattern when transport costs decline. Finally, we analytically examine the effects of trade liberalization on the welfare and show that both countries may gain from globalization.
There are no comments on this title.