Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Digital heritage. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and implications for convergence created by Helena Robinson

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: ; Volume , number ,Sydney Routledge 2012Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
Summary: In Australia and internationally, museums, libraries and archives are often described as ‘memory institutions’ in discussions about their possible convergence in the digital and physical realms. Yet a wider variety of organisations, such as schools, universities, media corporations, government or religious bodies could also legitimately be ascribed this title. In what special ways do museums, libraries and archives engage with the concept of ‘memory’? Do the roles of these organisations in shaping ‘memory’ align sufficiently for this concept to form the basis on which to ground arguments in favour of convergence? This paper interrogates the idea of ‘memory institutions’ and proposes that such a generic concept is not especially productive in facilitating the thorough, critical analysis necessary to highlight both the synergies and discords in the history and memory-making techniques of museums, libraries and archives.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections AM 121 MUS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol 27, No.4, pages 413-429 SP13722 Not for loan For Inhouse use only

In Australia and internationally, museums, libraries and archives are often described as ‘memory institutions’ in discussions about their possible convergence in the digital and physical realms. Yet a wider variety of organisations, such as schools, universities, media corporations, government or religious bodies could also legitimately be ascribed this title. In what special ways do museums, libraries and archives engage with the concept of ‘memory’? Do the roles of these organisations in shaping ‘memory’ align sufficiently for this concept to form the basis on which to ground arguments in favour of convergence? This paper interrogates the idea of ‘memory institutions’ and proposes that such a generic concept is not especially productive in facilitating the thorough, critical analysis necessary to highlight both the synergies and discords in the history and memory-making techniques of museums, libraries and archives.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.