Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

The amendment of IAS 39: determinants of reclassification behavior and capital market consequences/ created by Mari Paananen, Annelies Renders, and Kim M. Shima

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of accounting, auditing and finance ; Volume 27, number 2Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 0148558X
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HF5601 JOU
Online resources: Abstract: This study examines the determinants of banks’ decision to reclassify financial assets under the amendment of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39 and the capital market consequences of these reclassifications. Based on the prior literature, the authors identify two possible drivers of banks’ reclassification behavior, namely, solvency concerns and exposure to financial markets. The authors expect these reclassifications to adversely affect the market pricing of banks’ accounting numbers. The results of this study show that capital adequacy ratios close to the minimum requirement are indeed associated with banks’ decisions to reclassify financial assets. Furthermore, the authors find evidence that the level of exposure to fair value measurement also increases the probability to reclassify. In the second part of the analyses, they use a difference-in-differences approach to test the market’s pricing of bank’s accounting numbers around the time of reclassification. They observe that for reclassifying banks, investors rely less on earnings and book value of equity after the reclassifications than before. However, before the amendment of IAS 39, the authors find no difference in investors’ pricing of the accounting numbers of a control group of non-reclassifying banks and those of the reclassifying banks.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HF5601 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 27, no.2 (pages 208-235) SP15202 Not for loan For in house use only

This study examines the determinants of banks’ decision to reclassify financial assets under the amendment of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39 and the capital market consequences of these reclassifications. Based on the prior literature, the authors identify two possible drivers of banks’ reclassification behavior, namely, solvency concerns and exposure to financial markets. The authors expect these reclassifications to adversely affect the market pricing of banks’ accounting numbers. The results of this study show that capital adequacy ratios close to the minimum requirement are indeed associated with banks’ decisions to reclassify financial assets. Furthermore, the authors find evidence that the level of exposure to fair value measurement also increases the probability to reclassify. In the second part of the analyses, they use a difference-in-differences approach to test the market’s pricing of bank’s accounting numbers around the time of reclassification. They observe that for reclassifying banks, investors rely less on earnings and book value of equity after the reclassifications than before. However, before the amendment of IAS 39, the authors find no difference in investors’ pricing of the accounting numbers of a control group of non-reclassifying banks and those of the reclassifying banks.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.