Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Financial regulation and supervision in the European Union after the crisis created by Lucia Quaglia

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of Economic Policy Reform ; Volume 16, number 1,Oxfordshire Taylor and Francis 2013Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 17487870
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HD1918
Online resources: Summary: The global financial crisis challenged the existing architecture for financial services regulation and supervision in the European Union (EU). This article first examines the new pieces of legislation that were issued by the EU in the wake of the crisis, as well as substantial revisions of existing EU legislation. Second, it conducts an overall assessment of the reforms implemented and highlights some open issues that were underscored by the crisis and that were only partially addressed afterward. It is argued that the framework for financial regulation and supervision in the EU after the crisis is still poorly equipped to deal with (or to prevent) future financial crises mainly because of the political constraints encountered during the reform process. One of the most important lessons to be drawn is that political factors are as important as (if not more important than) economic factors in shaping financial services regulation and supervision in the EU (and, arguably, elsewhere).
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HD1918 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 16, No. 1 pages 17-30 Not for loan

The global financial crisis challenged the existing architecture for financial services regulation and supervision in the European Union (EU). This article first examines the new pieces of legislation that were issued by the EU in the wake of the crisis, as well as substantial revisions of existing EU legislation. Second, it conducts an overall assessment of the reforms implemented and highlights some open issues that were underscored by the crisis and that were only partially addressed afterward. It is argued that the framework for financial regulation and supervision in the EU after the crisis is still poorly equipped to deal with (or to prevent) future financial crises mainly because of the political constraints encountered during the reform process. One of the most important lessons to be drawn is that political factors are as important as (if not more important than) economic factors in shaping financial services regulation and supervision in the EU (and, arguably, elsewhere).

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.