Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Managerial share ownership and operating performance : do independent and executive directors have different incentives?/ created by Arifur Khan, Paul Mather and Balasingham Balachandran

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Australian journal of management ; Volume 39, number 1Los Angeles : Sage, 2014Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 03128962
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HD31 AUS
Online resources: Abstract: We investigate the relationship between managerial share ownership (MSO) and earnings as a measure of operating performance in Australia. To mitigate potential earnings management, we also use discretionary accrual adjusted earnings as an alternative measure of performance. We document a negative relation between MSO and performance followed by a positive relation. We suggest that these unique results are an artefact of certain Australian institutional features and imply that the ownership–performance relation is context-specific, with the wider corporate governance systems influencing the theorised incentive effects. We also posit that executive directors and independent directors have different ownership–performance incentives. Our results are consistent with this proposition and suggest that independent directors may be immune to the theorised incentive alignment or entrenchment effects associated with share ownership.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HD31 AUS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 39, no.1 (pages 47-72) Not for loan For in house use only

We investigate the relationship between managerial share ownership (MSO) and earnings as a measure of operating performance in Australia. To mitigate potential earnings management, we also use discretionary accrual adjusted earnings as an alternative measure of performance. We document a negative relation between MSO and performance followed by a positive relation. We suggest that these unique results are an artefact of certain Australian institutional features and imply that the ownership–performance relation is context-specific, with the wider corporate governance systems influencing the theorised incentive effects. We also posit that executive directors and independent directors have different ownership–performance incentives. Our results are consistent with this proposition and suggest that independent directors may be immune to the theorised incentive alignment or entrenchment effects associated with share ownership.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.