Just passing through: the effect of the Master Settlement Agreement on estimated cigarette tax price pass-through/ created by Dean R. Lillard and Andrew Sfekas
Material type: TextSeries: Applied Economics Letters ; Volume 20, number 4New York: Taylor and Francis, 2013Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 13504851
- HB1.A666 APP
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | HB1.A666 APP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 20, no.4 (pages 353-357) | SP17976 | Not for loan | For in house use only |
In 1998, cigarette manufacturers and state attorneys general in the United States settled a group of lawsuits in an agreement known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). Among the provisions of this agreement were a set of mandated escrow payments to the states that would be based on cigarette sales. The result of these provisions is that the apparent relationship between taxes and prices changed substantially following implementation of the MSA. This article estimates whether the MSA escrow amounts are reflected in prices and compares the pass-through rate of state and federal cigarette taxes only and the rate when one adds escrow payments. We find much different pass-through rates for the two measures. State and federal taxes are not fully passed to smokers. In years that escrow payments were made, cigarette prices increased by more than the sum of the state and federal taxes and the escrow payments.
There are no comments on this title.