Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

An experimental investigation of Colonel Blotto games/ created by Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Dan Kovenock and Roman M. Sheremeta

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Economic theory ; Volume 52, number 3Berlin: Springer, 2013Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 0938-2259
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HB119 ECO
Online resources: Abstract: This article examines behavior in the two-player, constant-sum Colonel Blotto game with asymmetric resources in which players maximize the expected number of battlefields won. The experimental results support the main qualitative predictions of the theory. In the auction treatment, where winning a battlefield is deterministic, disadvantaged players use a “guerilla warfare” strategy that stochastically allocates zero resources to a subset of battlefields. Advantaged players employ a “stochastic complete coverage” strategy, allocating random, but positive, resource levels across the battlefields. In the lottery treatment, where winning a battlefield is probabilistic, both players divide their resources equally across all battlefields. However, we also find interesting behavioral deviations from the theory and discuss their implications.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) vol. 53, no. 1 (pages 833-862) SP21288 Not for loan For in house use
Journal Article Journal Article Main Library - Special Collections HB119 ECO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 53, no.3 (pages 833-862) SP21041 Not for loan For in house use

This article examines behavior in the two-player, constant-sum Colonel Blotto game with asymmetric resources in which players maximize the expected number of battlefields won. The experimental results support the main qualitative predictions of the theory. In the auction treatment, where winning a battlefield is deterministic, disadvantaged players use a “guerilla warfare” strategy that stochastically allocates zero resources to a subset of battlefields. Advantaged players employ a “stochastic complete coverage” strategy, allocating random, but positive, resource levels across the battlefields. In the lottery treatment, where winning a battlefield is probabilistic, both players divide their resources equally across all battlefields. However, we also find interesting behavioral deviations from the theory and discuss their implications.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.