A legal analysis and contrarian view of the syllabus-as-contract perspective created by Kent D. Kauffman

By:

Kauffman, Kent D [author]

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Journal on excellence in college teaching ; Volume 26 , number 2,Canada: Miami University, 2015Content type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

ISSN:

1052-4800

Subject(s):

Course descriptions -- Legal problems -- Contracts

LOC classification:

LB1778 JOU

Abstract: Despite the claim made in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) literature for over two decades that a syllabus is a contract, the courts have uniformly ruled that it is not. While there is no harm in thinking one's syllabus is a contract, there may be legal risk in proclaiming it so. The author provides an analysis of the syllabus-as-contract dilemma as well as a review of the legal precedents. Best practices from contract drafting are applied to syllabus creation to enhance teaching and learning and minimize the legal risks of student grievances.

Reviews from LibraryThing.com:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Vol info	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
Journal Article	Main Library - Special Collections	LB1778 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Vol. 26, no.2 (pages177-197)	Not for loan	For in house use only

Despite the claim made in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) literature for over two decades that a syllabus is a contract, the courts have uniformly ruled that it is not. While there is no harm in thinking one's syllabus is a contract, there may be legal risk in proclaiming it so. The author provides an analysis of the syllabus-as-contract dilemma as well as a review of the legal precedents. Best practices from contract drafting are applied to syllabus creation to enhance teaching and learning and minimize the legal risks of student grievances.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

here