Do financial analysts add value by by facilitating more effective Monitoring of Firms Áctivities?/ Boochun Jung
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0148-558X
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HF5601 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol 27, No 1pages 61-100 | SP15200 | Not for loan | For In-house only |
Researchers argue that analysts’ information acquisition efforts increase firm value by facilitating monitoring of firms’ activities and, thereby, reducing agency costs. However, prior research provides limited and inconclusive empirical evidence to support this argument. This article extends the literature by examining (a) the relationship between analyst following and the value of firms’ equity securities and (b) given a positive relationship, whether that relationship reflects effectively enhanced monitoring of firms’ activities as a result of analysts’ information acquisition efforts. The authors document a positive relationship between analyst following and firms’ asset values, and they find support for two hypotheses regarding the source of the increased asset values. First, the cash component drives the positive relationship between analyst following and asset values. The authors interpret this evidence to imply a stronger monitoring effect for assets that are subject to higher agency costs or information asymmetry. Second, consistent with analyst following constraining asset mismanagement or motivating more efficient asset use, operating performance and total cash payout increase with analyst following. Overall, the results suggest that financial analysts facilitate more effective monitoring of firms’ activities and, thereby, reduce agency costs and increase shareholder value.
There are no comments on this title.