Protecting the olympic brand: winners and losers created by Trevor Hartland and Nicola Williams-Burnett

his paper considers the measures that have been put in place to protect brands and official sponsors of the London 2012 Olympic Games in an attempt to drive out the practice of ambush marketing. London's original bid to host the Games included measures to prevent ambush marketing and once awarded, passed legislation that made it illegal for companies that are not official sponsors to link their products with the Games. Through examination of the London Olympic and Paralympic Games Act 2006, together with case studies from previous Games, this paper questions the potential implications for other organisations should the letter of the law be applied. It is proposed that the Act goes far beyond its valid remit of preventing ambush marketing and is likely to restrict severely companies and other event organisers from pursuing their legitimate business practices. Exploratory research revealed a colossal 2,284,414 potential infringements of the Act. And while this may mean a win for the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG), it could potentially mean that other organisations become losers as they will be prevented from using specified terms and images without fear of falling foul of the law.

Keywords: ambush marketingsponsorshipOlympic GamesLondon 2012