Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams : evidence from early-stage drug discovery created by Shiko M. Ben-Menahem , Georg von Krogh , Zeynep Erden and Andreas Schneider
Material type: TextSeries: Academy of management journal ; Volume 59, number 4New York: Academy of management, 2016Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 00014273
- HD28 ACC
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | HD28 ACA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 59, no. 4 (pages 1308-1338) | SP26440 | Not for loan | For in house use |
Based on a multi-year field study of early-stage drug discovery project teams at a global pharmaceutical company, this paper examines how multidisciplinary teams engaged in knowledge creation combine formal and informal coordination mechanisms when faced with unpredictable interdependencies among specialists’ knowledge domains. While multidisciplinary teams are critical for knowledge creation in increasingly specialized work environments, the coordination literature has been divided with respect to the extent to which such teams rely on formal coordination structures and informal coordination practices. Our findings show that when interdependencies among knowledge domains are dynamic and unpredictable, specialists design self-managed (sub-)teams around collectively held assumptions about interdependencies based on incomplete information (conjectural interdependencies). These team structures establish the grounds for informal coordination practices that enable specialists to both manage known interdependencies and reveal new interdependencies. Newly revealed interdependencies among knowledge domains, in turn, promote structural adaptation. Drawing on these findings, we advance an integrative model explaining how team-based knowledge creation relies on the mutual constitution of formal coordination structures and informal coordination practices. The model contributes to theory on organizational design and practice-based research on coordination in cross-disciplinary knowledge creation.
There are no comments on this title.