The evaluation of participants’ perceptions of session impact : do counsellors-in-training, volunteer clients, and extra-credit/class required clients view session impact differently?/ created by John Beckenbach, Shawn Patrick and Jim Sells
Material type: TextSeries: British journal of guidance and counselling ; Volume 37, number 4London : Routledge, 2009Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 03069885
- LB1027.5 BRI
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | LB1027.5 BRI (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 37, no.4 (pages 485-494) | Not for loan | For in house use only |
Training programmes frequently recruit students from undergraduate classes to serve as clients for counsellors-in-training. Some of these clients receive external incentives for this participation, such as extra-credit or expectation of fulfilling a course requirement. It is unknown however whether or not this external incentive influences the perception of these sessions for clients and also for the counsellor-in-training. This article describes a study examining the impact of external incentive on client and counsellor-in-training session evaluation ratings. Some differences in perceptions for both counsellors and clients were found between sessions involving extra-credit and those not involving extra-credit. The training and ethical implications related to these findings is discussed.
There are no comments on this title.