Sectoral variation in collectively agreed employment protection : evidence from Dutch flexicurity created by Trudie Schils and Hester Houwing
Material type: TextSeries: European journal of industrial relations ; Volume 16, number 2London: sage, 2010Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 09596801
- HD9891.E87 EUR
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library Journal Article | HD8391.E87 EUR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 16, no. 2 (pages 137-152) | SP3842 | Not for loan | For in house use |
This article addresses the flexicurity outcomes of sectoral collective bargaining in the Netherlands. Dutch experience — presented as a model by the European Commission — proves not to be a case of ‘one size fits all’. Taking an institutionalist but firm-centred perspective, our analysis links the flexicurity policy debate to the theoretical analyses of ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ (VoC), which also stress various institutional constellations that can lead to equally optimal outcomes. In contrast to the core argument of the VoC perspective that diversity between institutional regimes is persistent, we find convergence across sectors over time. However, sectoral differences in the negotiated flexicurity balance remain apparent.
There are no comments on this title.