Metacognition as a mediator of the effect of test anxiety on a surface approach to studying created by Marcantonio M. Spada, Ana V. Nikcevic, Giovanni B. Moneta and Judy Ireson
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 0144-3410
- LB1051 EDU
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | LB1051 EDU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 26, no.5 (pages615-624) | Not for loan | For in house use only | |||
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | LB1051 EDU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 26, no.5 (pages615-624) | Not for loan | For in house use only |
This study investigated the role of metacognition as a mediator of the effect of test anxiety on a surface approach to studying. The following scales were completed by 109 undergraduate social sciences students: Approaches and Study Skills Inventories for Students (ASSIST), Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ), and Test Anxiety Scale (TAS). Positive and significant correlations were observed between test anxiety and a surface approach to studying, and between all five dimensions of metacognition and test anxiety. Positive and significant correlations were also found between four of the five dimensions of metacognition and a surface approach to studying. Structural equation modelling was used to test a mediational model in which test anxiety predicted metacognition which in turn predicted a surface approach to studying. The results supported the hypothesis that the effect of test anxiety on a surface approach to studying is entirely mediated by metacognition. The practical implications of these findings are outlined.
There are no comments on this title.