Asset tangibility, industry representation and the cross section of equity returns/ created by Paul Docherty, Howard Chan, and Steve Easton
Material type:
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 03128962
- HD31 AUS
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HD31 AUS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 36, no.1 (pages 75-88) | Not for loan | For in house use only |
Recent theory relates expected returns and covariant risk to the investment decisions of a firm across certain stages of the business cycle. Using the Australian accounting environment that provides a wider scope for the capitalisation of intangible assets compared with the United States, this paper tests the relationship between asset tangibility and returns within the Fama and MacBeth (1973) framework. A relationship is found to exist between asset tangibility and the cross-section of equity returns. This relationship is most evident in the materials industry, which is characterised by irreversible, firm-specific assets. These results persist after controlling for firm characteristics that Fama and French (1992) show are related to returns, although the effect is largely driven by microcap stocks.
There are no comments on this title.