Affect and marketing stimuli in consumer loyalty decisions to automobile insurers/ created by Steve A.Taylor
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 14791846
- HG11 JOU
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
PostGraduate Studies Library - Special Collections | HG11 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | volume 18, number 1 (pages 4-13) | Not for loan | For in house use only | |||
![]() |
PostGraduate Studies Library - Special Collections | HG11 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | volume 18, number 1 (pages 4-13) | Not for loan | For in house use only |
Browsing PostGraduate Studies Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Most insurance loyalty studies assume largely cognitive psychological underpinnings. A study is conducted that investigates the relative contributions of cognitive versus affective influences on the desire to be loyal to an automobile insurer after a poor service experience. Three hundred and fifteen respondents were introduced to scenarios that manipulated the response to an advertisement to switch insurers by price- and brand-related marketing influences to investigate their influence on anticipated regret (AR). The results support the conclusions that both cognitive and affective considerations are important to consumer judgment and decision-making (J/DM) processes in the context of car insurance, that male and female customers may vary in their J/DM processes with car insurance, and that insurance modelers of J/DM should consider outside influences on consumers in studies, particularly marketing-related brand and price perceptions. Failure to do so can lead to a failure to correctly predict potential action versus inaction effects associated with AR.
There are no comments on this title.