The International Committee of the Red Cross in Afghanistan: reasserting the neutrality of humanitarian action created by Fiona Terry
Material type: TextSeries: International Review of the Red Cross ; Volume 93, number 881Geneva: Cambridge University Press, 2011Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 18163831
- HV560 INT
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library - Special Collections | HV560 INT (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 93, no. 881 (pages 173-188) | SP10864 | Not for loan | For in house use |
Neutrality as a guiding principle of humanitarian action was roundly rejected by most actors in Afghanistan's latest conflict. One party to the conflict commandeered assistance and aid organizations into a counter-insurgency campaign, and the other rejected Western aid organizations as agents of an imperialist West. The murder in 2003 of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) water engineer Ricardo Munguia, because of what he symbolized, cast doubt on whether the ICRC could be perceived as neutral in this highly polarized context. Rather than abandon a neutral stance, however, as so many aid organizations did, the ICRC persevered and, through some innovative and sometimes risky initiatives, managed to show both sides the benefits of having a neutral intermediary in conflict. Today, the ICRC continues to expand its reach to Afghans in dire need of humanitarian assistance.
There are no comments on this title.