Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Client employment of previous auditors: shareholders views on auditor independence created by Eleanor Dart and Roy Chandler

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Accounting and business research ; Volume 43, number 3Abingdon: Routledge, 2013Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 00014788
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HD30.4 ACC
Online resources: Abstract: The role of auditors is to add credibility to financial information and to reduce the risk of management manipulation or concealment. It is vital that auditors be independent of company management. In practice, however, various circumstances may pose a potential threat to auditor independence. One of these threats is the employment of an ex-auditor by a client company. Relatively little research has so far been carried out in this area. We investigated whether investors (both private and institutional) perceived the employment of a former auditor by an audit client as a threat to the independence of the audit firm and whether they would invest in a company which had ‘poached’ a member of the audit team. We found little evidence of concern on the part of institutional investors about the risks posed by auditors joining former client companies. However, private investors demonstrated significantly greater levels of concern about issues related to auditor independence. Although there were differences in the views of institutional and private investors, there did not appear to be a strong demand from respondents to our survey for more stringent restrictions on the movement of auditors from audit firms to audit clients.
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

The role of auditors is to add credibility to financial information and to reduce the risk of management manipulation or concealment. It is vital that auditors be independent of company management. In practice, however, various circumstances may pose a potential threat to auditor independence. One of these threats is the employment of an ex-auditor by a client company. Relatively little research has so far been carried out in this area. We investigated whether investors (both private and institutional) perceived the employment of a former auditor by an audit client as a threat to the independence of the audit firm and whether they would invest in a company which had ‘poached’ a member of the audit team. We found little evidence of concern on the part of institutional investors about the risks posed by auditors joining former client companies. However, private investors demonstrated significantly greater levels of concern about issues related to auditor independence. Although there were differences in the views of institutional and private investors, there did not appear to be a strong demand from respondents to our survey for more stringent restrictions on the movement of auditors from audit firms to audit clients.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.