The common European flexicurity principles : how a fragile consensus was reached created by Mikkel Mailand
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ba/6b0ba83dea1b2061c05bcfba62c4cc7e8d358d60" alt="Text"
- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 09596801
- HD8371 EUR
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library - Special Collections | HD8371 EUR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 16, no. 3 (pages 241-258) | SP6009 | Not for loan | For in house use |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: - Special Collections Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
This article analyses the decision-making process underlying the adoption of common EU flexicurity principles. Supporters of the initiative succeeded in convincing the sceptics one by one; the change of government in France and the last-minute support of the European social partner organizations were instrumental in this regard. However, the critics succeeded in weakening the initially strong focus on the transition from job security to employment security and the divisions between insiders and outsiders in the labour market. In contrast to some decision-making on the European Employment Strategy, coalitions seem to have played only a minor role in the flexicurity process, although some actors joined forces in their attempts to influence the outcome.
There are no comments on this title.