Social regulation and diversity management: A comparative study of France, Canada and the UK created by
Material type: TextSeries: European journal of industrial relations ; Volume 18, number 4Producer: London: Sage, 2012Content type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 09596801
- HD8371 EUR
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library Journal Article | HD8371 EUR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol. 18, no. 4 (pages 309-328) | SP14924 | Not for loan | For in house use |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: Journal Article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Much of the diversity management debate is trapped in a binary opposition between regulation and voluntarism. We argue for an evidence-based approach and illustrate this by offering a context-sensitive overview of workforce diversity debate and practice in three countries: France, Canada and the UK. We use Reynaud’s social regulation theory in order to challenge the assumption that there is a clear separation between regulation and voluntarism. The article unpacks the complexities and ambivalences of regulation of workforce diversity, which is generated by multiple influences.
There are no comments on this title.