Midlands State University Library
Image from Google Jackets

Identity and change: recent developments and future directions created by Deborah Price and Rolf van Dick

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Journal of change management ; Volume 12, number 1Abingdon: Routledge, 2012Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISSN:
  • 14697017
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • HD58.8 JOU
Online resources: Abstract: Organizational change, once endemic, can now be seen to have reached epidemic proportions. The stark reality of the global economy is one in which international economic circumstances have profound repercussions for organizations, be they private sector enterprises trying to maintain market share, or public and voluntary sector enterprises trying to reduce costs while continuing to meet demand. Change is therefore not simply desirable, it is necessary to ensuring survival. Change within an organization sets out to alter the characteristics of that organization, be it radical planned change disrupting the very fabric of the organization, or emergent change slowly steering a new direction. Such alterations necessitate discontinuities in the relationships between the organization and those who work within. Beyond the extrinsic motivators of reward and remuneration, the relationships that people have with organizations offer them a locus for identification. Where change disturbs the relationship, it also disturbs the processes of identification. As a form of social identity, organizational identification (van Dick et al., 2004) allows people to draw on the central, distinctive and enduring characteristics of the organization (Albert and Whetten, 1985), as referents informing their sense of who they are in relation to others (Pratt, 1998). This social identity theory (see Haslam, 2004) suggests the ways in which on-going organizational narratives shape people’s sense of self. From a self-categorization perspective, disruption to the in-group versus out-group landscape challenges people’s ability to situate their identity in any meaningful way (Turner et al., 1994).
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Vol info Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Journal Article Journal Article Law Library - Special Collections HD58.8 JOU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Vol. 12, no. 1 (pages 7-12) SP13617 Not for loan For in house use

Organizational change, once endemic, can now be seen to have reached epidemic proportions. The stark reality of the global economy is one in which international economic circumstances have profound repercussions for organizations, be they private sector enterprises trying to maintain market share, or public and voluntary sector enterprises trying to reduce costs while continuing to meet demand. Change is therefore not simply desirable, it is necessary to ensuring survival. Change within an organization sets out to alter the characteristics of that organization, be it radical planned change disrupting the very fabric of the organization, or emergent change slowly steering a new direction. Such alterations necessitate discontinuities in the relationships between the organization and those who work within. Beyond the extrinsic motivators of reward and remuneration, the relationships that people have with organizations offer them a locus for identification. Where change disturbs the relationship, it also disturbs the processes of identification. As a form of social identity, organizational identification (van Dick et al., 2004) allows people to draw on the central, distinctive and enduring characteristics of the organization (Albert and Whetten, 1985), as referents informing their sense of who they are in relation to others (Pratt, 1998). This social identity theory (see Haslam, 2004) suggests the ways in which on-going organizational narratives shape people’s sense of self. From a self-categorization perspective, disruption to the in-group versus out-group landscape challenges people’s ability to situate their identity in any meaningful way (Turner et al., 1994).

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.